Because We Know Legal

A blog devoted to posting the typical work of California's courts of appeals; the published "unpublished", yet uncitable decisions that the court makes on a daily basis.

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

P. v. Farmer

Filed 11/29/05 P. v. Farmer CA5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT









THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


JASON FARMER,


Defendant and Appellant.




F047954



(Super. Ct. No. MCR11387B)




OPINION



THE COURT*


APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Edward P. Moffat, Judge.


Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.



-ooOoo-


Appellant, Jason Farmer, pled no contest to possession of stolen property (case No. 11387B/Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)). On April 8, 2002, the court placed Farmer on probation for three years on condition that he serve one year local time. On April 10, 2005, Farmer admitted violating his probation and pled guilty in case No. MCR14436 to a misdemeanor charge of the unauthorized use of an access card (Pen. Code, § 484f). On April 29, 2005, the court sentenced appellant to the aggravated term of three years on his possession of stolen property conviction and time served on his misdemeanor conviction.


Farmer’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Farmer has not responded to this court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.


Following independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.


The judgment is affirmed.


Courtesy of California Legal Resource Directory, a source for providers and consumers of legal resources. Because we know legal.


Chula Vista Lawyers are available and standing by to help you.


* Before Vartabedian, Acting P.J., Cornell, J., and Dawson, J.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home