Because We Know Legal

A blog devoted to posting the typical work of California's courts of appeals; the published "unpublished", yet uncitable decisions that the court makes on a daily basis.

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

City of Stockton v. Grech

Filed 11/10/05 City of Stockton v. Grech CA3


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(San Joaquin)


----








CITY OF STOCKTON,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


MICHAEL GRECH et al.,


Defendants and Appellants.



C044240


(Sup.Ct. No. CV011617)


Order Modifying Opinion


and Denying Rehearing;


No change in judgment



THE COURT:


The opinion filed herein on October 12, 2005, is modified in the following manner:


On page 26, the costs award is revised so the Disposition


now reads:


The judgment is affirmed. Defendants shall recover costs on appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1268.720.)



This modification does not change the judgment.


The petition for rehearing is denied.


FOR THE COURT:


RAYE , Acting P.J.


MORRISON , J.


ROBIE , J.


Courtesy of California Legal Resource Directory, a source for providers and consumers of legal resources. Because we know legal.


Chula Vista Lawyers are available and standing by to help you.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home