In re Armando V.

Filed 11/30/05 In re Armando V. CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re ARMANDO V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARMANDO V., Defendant and Appellant.	G035015 (Super. Ct. No. DL015529) O P I N I O N

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gregory W. Jones, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.

Danalynn Pritz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * *

We appointed counsel to represent Armando V. on appeal. Counsel filed a brief which set forth the facts of the case. Counsel did not argue against the minor, but advised the court no issues were found to argue on his behalf. We have examined the record and found no arguable issue. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Armando V. was given 30 days to file written argument in his own behalf. That period has passed, and we have received no communication from him.

The judgment is affirmed.

ARONSON, J.

WE CONCUR:

SILLS, P. J.

FYBEL, J.

Courtesy of California Legal Resource Directory, a source for providers and consumers of legal resources. Because we know legal.

Alpine Lawyers are available and standing by to help you.